Skip to main content

Of Human Nature


                                         * Francesca Woodman, Untitled

  ( Francesca Woodman’s photography is akin to performance art. The performers’ (repeatedly featuring the photographer herself) self-awareness is clear. But they often seem more compelled than voluntary to give their performance. Looking at Woodman’s photographs of bleak, unnerving drama I was immediately reminded of the typical interplay between an abductor-cum-masochist and his prey, in which the former will entertain himself by commanding the prisoner to put on various grotesque (often erotic) poses. It becomes obvious that Woodman was steeped in surrealist tradition, yet unlike Man Ray, the allegedly pivotal figure of surrealist photography, Woodman did not lean on photographic techniques to create the otherworldly effects. The photographs are rather realistic, but the narratives behind each shot are mostly beyond comprehension. Woodman’s work only becomes even more mysterious when she ended her life aged merely 22 by throwing herself out of the window of her New York apartment.)




 

Nature tells stories beyond our ken. At least that is what he notices when tears inevitably drop on the leaves and they tremble, once and twice then no more. Carefully ensconced in the bushes, the scenes of the event are only partly visible to the little boy. Relieved, the little boy is however seized by a convulsion of unstoppable sobs. But the sobs do stop when the tears have no companies to share with. Excepts everything that stirs or murmurs, the little boy is all alone in the forest.


 

He bends his ear to the ground and the noise of an ongoing funeral amplified. He can hear a mixture of brass instruments shrieking every time the priest stops speaking. The speech of the priest is recognized at once a hypnotic chant, as if he was assuaging the careless animation of nature. For sure the little boy can sense several butterflies rollicking just above the priest’s head, and the priest, too preoccupied in his saintly duty, is unable to dismiss the irreverent insects, who are now drawing halos around him. Once or twice the weeps of the mourners escape not the keen ears of the little boy, and strangely they seem to overshadow the priest’s solemn prayer. The little boy will like to surmise the priest’s tendency to sing during his interminable speech, as judged by his monotone, which is suddenly leavened up by a slight lilt at the end of each sentence. The priest’s kind intention of rendering the funeral a less bleak affair is however not felt by some of the attendants, who bury their woe in the creases of their billowy dresses.


 

The little boy seeks some momentary comforts staying in his horizontal pose, prostrating on the barrel ground anticipating the requiem. And before long the pacification of the death does begin. But the starting note is perceptibly strayed out of tune; the slackness of the performers is to be blamed. Little attention is fixed upon such unpardonable flaw. The mourners now seemingly lost in the ecstasy come only after the forceful concealment of extreme sorrow. And they crane their necks to gaze at heaven, looking forward to a few drops of heavenly tears to assail their stoic masks. Even though the sky is cloudless and devoid of any telltale signs of an overcast weather, the mourners hardly avert their eyes when the threat of sun and lights looms. As if the people are all blind. They all are, afterward, grown apathetic, when blinded by their unspeakable emotions.


 

Therefore only the nature surrounding him offers solace to his wounded heart. The little boy plays listlessly with a grabful of weeds. The whispers nature gives are always elusive. The sentences uttered are fractured and never seem to end. Once the little boy assumes he has formed companionship with nature and leans on his ears, everything suddenly becomes motionless and confides no more. A pair of boots is visible under the lower-half of the little boy’s glance. Without any words or ado the uncle is going to fetch his nephew away.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honore Daumier

“If you shut up truth and bury it under ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”- Émile Zola
Exited Honoré Victorin Daumier, 10 February 1879, in an impoverishment that many of his contemporaries, especially his foes, would have thought was his long overdue retribution- the painter was blind, heavily in debt, and later relegated to a pauper’s grave. His friends, upon visiting his resting place, would, I imagine, see it a chance to admonish their children: “Now that’s a lesson for you cheeky devils whose tongues rattle off things that should better stay unspoken.” But Daumier devoted his life in revealing those “unspoken things.” His lithography ink proved sharper than most writers’ pens. He vented his rage and stigmatised others’ infamy in his satirical and, oftentimes, side-splitting cartoons. The tone was relentlessly acerbic but only because Daumier was exposing truths that, in the time…

Review: Late Spring (1949)

As a storyteller, Yasujiro Ozu insists on an implausibly objective stance that refrains from direct commentary or criticism; his camera customarily assumes the role of a detached observer, to whom the characters in the film, staring or talking straight to the camera, occasionally address, with an intimacy akin to that between a host and his guest, a closeness that is underpinned by a mutual recognition of the psychological distance that separates the two. The audience, whose perspective, in this case, conflates the camera’s (the director’s), an invisible character’s in the film (to whom the other characters address) and their own, is thus situated amidst this spatial complexity which, as a rule, every work of art necessarily creates.
In Late Spring (1948), the camera serves in part as an underlying comment to the story, which is noted by its economy of details. A prolonged shot of a departing train, on which the father and daughter travel to the city for a one-day excursion, prefigures…

Review: Come Back, Little Sheba (1952)

Every adversity in life is a test of one's fortitude, the occasion of which, as proved invariably in the past, man is capable of defying destiny, of reversing the inexorable course to which life is doomed to tend. Too often we sympathise with the travails of the dogged, indefatigable fighter, whose hard-on victory we shed tears of relief and admiration, and whose stories and examples we evoke when in need of a boost of morale or motivation, that our notion of heroism has come to be hallowed with a glow of divinity peculiar to those who triumph in their fights. Those who fail – the martyrs who labour for nothing, who die without fulfilling what they die for – they are regarded with no less sympathy, but to recount their stories we averse, refusing to be reminded of what ultimately makes us humans – our inherent and infinite capacity to fail.
To face up to one’s failures, especially with the forlorn hope that such failures can ever be remedied, requires a special kind of courage. Wil…