If still-life painting is not invariably an
art of contemplation, then what comes closest is perhaps the painting of faint
light against dark, like candlelight in the time before electricity, or the
gleam of moonlight in the pitch-dark of night. Those are the lights that give
out hopes, a sense of security and serenity. I am not referring to the lights
that partly reveal the true colour of a monster- the shock of lightening that
triggers all the wicked happenings. Those paintings of more sinister overtones
are not discussed here. I always value more the glimmer of light than the
overwhelming darkness.
Georges de La Tour’s The Penitent Magdalen (1638-43) is a painting embedded with symbolisms.
The skull nestling on Mary’s knees is the emblem for mortality; the candle, the
spiritual enlightenment; the mirror, the reflection of human’s vanity. Mary is
aware of herself as a mortal and thus she is staring at herself instinctively into
the mirror. Or rather, she is staring at the candle, or the reflection of the
candle in the mirror? It is an irony that the candle is deliberately placed
before the mirror. The candle and the mirror therefore are the contenders that
fight to become the most lasting value in human lives. Obviously the candle
claims the victory in the end, with the mirror submissively allows an imprint
of the flame which burns determinedly and coruscatingly- an implication of the dismissal
of earthly vanities and the triumph of the power of divinity. Seeing such image
Mary is visibly entranced. Her fingers crossed and poised atop the skull; Mary harbours
a momentary wish of aligning herself with the deities.
The gleam of hope can also be engendered in
a time of hardships and predicaments. Vincent van Gogh’s Potato Eaters (1885) is a testimony of all the sketchiest and the crudest.
The peasants’ faces are scarily grotesque: eyes are sunken and creases and
indentations ploughed deep. The image is unapologetically ugly, with the its
ugliness augmented by the loose brushstrokes and dark colourisation. Amidst the
oppressive gloominess the only source of light comes from what hangs from the
ceiling. But an artificial light it is, which seems also to serve cruelly as a
mockery of the peasants’ impoverishment. Whilst most viewers tend to sympathize
with the peasants’ misfortune, what reached me first when seeing this painting was
all the characteristics that made Van Gogh distinct from his ancestors. The
light therefore is not artificial at all, but a torch bore by Van Gogh, shining
up the path treaded by his fellow post-impressionists.
Warmth oozes from the break-through of
light, most evident in Jean-Francois Millet’s Angelus (1857-59). This is a painting of contemplation, and the
committed love of the earth. Both the man and the woman’s heads hung in devout
prayer before heading home after a day’s toil. The figures are shaded with
sombre tones and made similar to that of the soil. Their affiliation with the
earth they step on is so strong that at any moment the two can blend together
unsurprisingly. The setting sun has some pale blueness and redness trailing
behind it- the only light colours that leavened the heaviness of the painting.
I do not know if Gabriel Garcia Marquez,
when writing One Hundred Years of
Solitude, had any particular picture in mind that echoed the image invoked by
the novel. By my humble estimation, after reading Marquez’s epic novel,
Jean-Francois Millet’s depictions of the farmers’ lives are what come the
closest. Both One Hundred Years of
Solitude and Millet’s genre paintings exude a sense of humility, not only
to the home they are raised in but also to nature and the universe that
encompass. Darkness never befalls those people’s lives but only a greyish
murkiness that comes and goes periodically. At times a ray of light peeks
through the gathering clouds, yet once the heads are lifting up in search of
hopes, the light diminishes, leaving merely a trail of faint afterglow that swans
weakly around the heaven.
Comments
Post a Comment