Are still-life paintings exclusively for
the contemplators? Not exactly. One can discover the abnormal amidst the most
normal and mundane. Staring at still-lives is like staring at sculptures: you
secretly harbour a childish anticipation that somehow these inanimate objects
will eventually move. But still-lives function more than mere drab figments of one’s
otherwise fanciful imagination. Different from landscape or other outdoor
paintings, in which the painters are more like photographers relying on
beautiful chances that contribute to their artworks, still-life painters have
more leeway of arranging their subjects. In this case the end product is not
only an artwork, but a creation.
As hideously as they often appear to be,
still-life paintings with raw meat nonetheless never cease to fascinate me. French
painter Jean-Baptiste-Simeon Chardin, who is considered a master of genre
paintings and perhaps most noted for his Soap Bubbles (1733-34), a nostalgic image of childhood wonders and unspoilt naiveté,
made a not-so-appealing still-life painting in 1728, titled The Ray. A pile of dead fish is placed
at the centre of the table. Among them an especially repulsive-looking one hung
on the meat hook, its entrails spilling forth unrestrainedly. The redness of
the entrails is however what lightens up this rather sombre-coloured painting. I
am immediately reminded of the colourisation in one of J.M.W. Turner’s volcanic
eruption landscape paintings. This painting thus does not seem to me revolting
at all; on seeing the red meat a shiver of excitement reaches down my spine. A
frisky cat looks determined to stir up a pell-mell of the scene, but by no
means can it easily overshadow the presence of the dead fish, which almost stands
out as a singular star in this painting.
Even when life is still, it can always
manage to play with your sense of reality. In Paul Cezanne’s Still Life with Cherub (1895),
everything seems to take a reckless tumble. The painting creates a strong sense
of disorientation. Cezanne’s initial conception was actually to present the
views of approaching the cherub through various different angles. This is an
ingenious attempt at creating a three-dimensional space and an optical effect. That
makes the cherub bust the centre of the painting, whilst everything revolves
around it. But again, the contrast of colourisation can easily dismantle the assumed
ego of the star. Contrary to the pale-blueness of the bust is the
brownish-green of the oranges, each of which asserts its identity and refuses
to be lumped together as sheer adornment. Still
Life with Cherub (1895) is a painting in which every element fights for the
spot of the sole star.
Time is never still. Even in still-life
paintings when the lapse of time is immeasurable, we vaguely second-guess the
changes of appearances over time. In Roger Fenton’s Still Life of Fruit with Mirror and Figurines (1860) we are aware
of the gradual diminishment of the freshness and sheen of the fruits; their
uncorrupted beauty complimented by the angel busts poising beside. A mirror
hangs atop the fruit basket, seemingly to serve as a cruel reflection of the
fruits, bearing the record of their imminent rottenness. Fenton’s still-life
photography is the representation of decadent beauty- one which is not so
anomalous within the aristocratic circle.
For me Fenton’s photography, amidst other
even more artistically beautiful paintings, ingrains the most indelible
impression in my head. It reverberates with what we feel most tangibly as human
beings, that everything just eventually peters out and fades.
Comments
Post a Comment