Skip to main content

The Fighter

A real fighter must never look back. The road he sallies forth his pilgrimage, trudges pass all obstacles and comes striding into the battlefield where the fate of his game is decided- this road should, for the present, remains merely a faint lustre of a fading rainbow: diaphanous, forgettable within several blinks of eyes. The fighter is a loner and sole player of his own game.

The contortions on a fighter’s face give an impression of a child blowing up a balloon, but the fighter is more like the balloon than the child. His immortal strength is what the gods are most envious of. At any moment the fighter is expected to transform into a sacred figure; that the harder he fights the lighter he feels. Eventually everything is levitated.

However, when a fighter is defeated it is like a monolith that collapses. The spectators are at a loss of what to do but gape, until slants of scintillating gaze strikes the fighter like the bitterest mockeries. Thus the fighter is made to stand on his feet, or, in some critical situations, totter to his balance on the scorching ground, trembled by a succession of the audience’s beastly howls.

Those human figures by Francis Bacon are often blown up in violent disruptions and eruptions. When depicting a figure in accelerated movement the painter did not do so at the expense of its substantiality- what is presented on the canvas is still a concrete, fleshy being. Titled Portrait of George Dyer Riding a Bicycle (1966), Bacon appropriately made cycling a dizzying sport. Even the ground swirls as if in a circus arena. The painting reminds me of Degas’ Miss La La at the Cirque Fernando, but it isn’t too marvelous a spectacle as a sight of desolation: a quixotic cyclist circling in his immurement. An invisible, unknown somebody seems to be playing a very cruel trick.

An exciting tournament should be fizzed with sweats and vigour. George Bellows’ oil depictions of wrestling channel the masculine beauty inherent in the paintings and sculptures of the Old Masters. The colours fleet with movement. The tense muscles, the ruddiness of complexions and contortions of faces- the captured moment is in an apparent stalemate. A spectator with a cigar in mouth looks amusingly on; just the facial expression of any onlooker who gloats over the pain and toil of the sufferers.

Sportsmen can be performers whose only function is to entertain the impassive audience. The play they put upon is their ultimate guise, dissembling their weary souls of which spirits are destitute. Edgar Degas was obviously more interested in the backbreaking rehearsals of ballets than the performances. From those self-same ballet oils we gather how professional the ballerinas are as dancers and actors. Offstage is a world unimaginably grim: dancers stroking their sour backs and yawning uncontrollably. But even in their most torpid state the ballerinas still look effortlessly attractive. A man in suit gazes in entracement by aids of the intervening light coming from the foreground; the gaze suggests utter voyeurism.

Even after the fight the shadows of the fighters hover around the battleground. But the spectators take no notice of the lingering shadows as they file out, leaving an empty stadium swallow bitterly its echoing emptiness. The fighter with his body covered with wounds hobbles towards the battleground to face his Shadow, positively the most invincible opponent he’s ever met in his life. Without any soul witnessing the game the fighter fights on. And always will the fighter persists in fighting until the Shadow dissolves.


Popular posts from this blog

Honore Daumier

“If you shut up truth and bury it under ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”- Émile Zola
Exited Honoré Victorin Daumier, 10 February 1879, in an impoverishment that many of his contemporaries, especially his foes, would have thought was his long overdue retribution- the painter was blind, heavily in debt, and later relegated to a pauper’s grave. His friends, upon visiting his resting place, would, I imagine, see it a chance to admonish their children: “Now that’s a lesson for you cheeky devils whose tongues rattle off things that should better stay unspoken.” But Daumier devoted his life in revealing those “unspoken things.” His lithography ink proved sharper than most writers’ pens. He vented his rage and stigmatised others’ infamy in his satirical and, oftentimes, side-splitting cartoons. The tone was relentlessly acerbic but only because Daumier was exposing truths that, in the time…

Review: Late Spring (1949)

As a storyteller, Yasujiro Ozu insists on an implausibly objective stance that refrains from direct commentary or criticism; his camera customarily assumes the role of a detached observer, to whom the characters in the film, staring or talking straight to the camera, occasionally address, with an intimacy akin to that between a host and his guest, a closeness that is underpinned by a mutual recognition of the psychological distance that separates the two. The audience, whose perspective, in this case, conflates the camera’s (the director’s), an invisible character’s in the film (to whom the other characters address) and their own, is thus situated amidst this spatial complexity which, as a rule, every work of art necessarily creates.
In Late Spring (1948), the camera serves in part as an underlying comment to the story, which is noted by its economy of details. A prolonged shot of a departing train, on which the father and daughter travel to the city for a one-day excursion, prefigures…

Review: Breathless (1960)

Jean Luc Godard’s first feature feels oddly like a swansong: in many respects the film seems a self-mockery of what it ostensibly celebrates – the new, the bold, the reckless; the 60s zeitgeist that resurrects the anguished ghosts of the 1920s, who, according to F. Scott Fitzgerald, grow up to “find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faith in man shaken.” For the children of the ‘60s, their wars are of a kind in which the opponents constantly change roles: sometimes they are the unmerciful authorities bent on making miserable lives out of their inferiors; in other times they are the society at large, weeding out in its insidious and devious way the errant law-breakers. They all seem to be donning the same masks, through which the warriors recognise themselves.
This fight with one’s inner demon necessarily evokes concerns of mortality and death - timeless concerns that acquire an added pungency in the 1960s: would a dangerous, unheeding spell of hedonism finally defy life’s incontrove…