Skip to main content

The Blue Painting

The room is resounded with a little wearied voice chanting plaintively of flowers. Flowers, as the chant goes, are like fugitive happiness, utterly ravaged the point when you too dearly fondle them. Flowers, however, are what this room is deprived of. The room is dismally poky and contains only some cumbersome cupboards, which are glass-fronted, and show the reflection of a young lady who professes a penchant of having her life staring back at her. But the presence of the young lady remains invisible to whoever witnessing the depicted scene, saves the white lace dress, which whiteness is now somewhat compromised by a few stains of dirt, she was wearing on the day of her unaccountable disappearance. Away the white dress sashays and dances, controlled by a pair of hands that are also nowhere to be seen.

No sentiments or emotions reign supreme in this derelict house. Nor are evil spirits that are provoked to their vicious extremes. Rancours of long ago, of yesterday, are pardoned in this place where time is constantly trapped in a speeding circle: winter has yet laid its frosty spell before it is rushed to summer at its most torrid. One minute you are the newly-crowned champion, the next you are trampled on the ground, the lowest of the abject. How many hitherto redoubtable kings she now mocks, how many foes of hers she relishes in tormenting. The imperious hand gives the wheel of fate yet another turn.

We now advance to the stage where the young lady is already immortalised, in a portrait hung on the wall, facing the window. It is the first time we encounter our young lady in flesh and blood, for virtually we have the impression that what we behold is not merely a painting, but the young lady herself, like a spectre whose body is translucent, is floating before the picture frame, her gaze constantly fixing upon ours wherever we go. Under such vigilance of the young lady we however confess that we do not find her watchful gaze in any way provocative or frightening. Even the lights that occasionally flood in through the window fail to ignite the fire in her eyes, the fire that some once described as blue and smoke-filled.

The portrait looks like throngs of heavy smoke. Our desire to see our young lady more clearly is obstructed by the painting’s nebulousness. The portrait does nothing to supply sufficient knowledge of a young lady who has lived so quietly all her life, that very little is known about her. What we behold, as we discover, is not too far from the invisible young lady straying about the dinky room. To strain our eyes in order to see through the invisibleness we have white, doughy smoke swimming in our eyes.

The image of flowers suddenly takes dominance of all. White poppies blossom in the depth of night, or before the break of dawn when faint traces of every colour run amok. That is what Blue is like, we finally realise. It is the pitch dark when the innocent white explode here and there. It is the union of these two colours that create the opaque. It is the invisible that we pretend we have witnessed with unquestionable clarity. Ultimately Blue is the room where time plods on, before uttering almost inaudibly the transience of love, and these beautiful sweet nothings will be sublimated into the flaky, fluffy, inconsequential potions, teeming the air.


Popular posts from this blog

Honore Daumier

“If you shut up truth and bury it under ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”- Émile Zola
Exited Honoré Victorin Daumier, 10 February 1879, in an impoverishment that many of his contemporaries, especially his foes, would have thought was his long overdue retribution- the painter was blind, heavily in debt, and later relegated to a pauper’s grave. His friends, upon visiting his resting place, would, I imagine, see it a chance to admonish their children: “Now that’s a lesson for you cheeky devils whose tongues rattle off things that should better stay unspoken.” But Daumier devoted his life in revealing those “unspoken things.” His lithography ink proved sharper than most writers’ pens. He vented his rage and stigmatised others’ infamy in his satirical and, oftentimes, side-splitting cartoons. The tone was relentlessly acerbic but only because Daumier was exposing truths that, in the time…

Review: Late Spring (1949)

As a storyteller, Yasujiro Ozu insists on an implausibly objective stance that refrains from direct commentary or criticism; his camera customarily assumes the role of a detached observer, to whom the characters in the film, staring or talking straight to the camera, occasionally address, with an intimacy akin to that between a host and his guest, a closeness that is underpinned by a mutual recognition of the psychological distance that separates the two. The audience, whose perspective, in this case, conflates the camera’s (the director’s), an invisible character’s in the film (to whom the other characters address) and their own, is thus situated amidst this spatial complexity which, as a rule, every work of art necessarily creates.
In Late Spring (1948), the camera serves in part as an underlying comment to the story, which is noted by its economy of details. A prolonged shot of a departing train, on which the father and daughter travel to the city for a one-day excursion, prefigures…

Review: Breathless (1960)

Jean Luc Godard’s first feature feels oddly like a swansong: in many respects the film seems a self-mockery of what it ostensibly celebrates – the new, the bold, the reckless; the 60s zeitgeist that resurrects the anguished ghosts of the 1920s, who, according to F. Scott Fitzgerald, grow up to “find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faith in man shaken.” For the children of the ‘60s, their wars are of a kind in which the opponents constantly change roles: sometimes they are the unmerciful authorities bent on making miserable lives out of their inferiors; in other times they are the society at large, weeding out in its insidious and devious way the errant law-breakers. They all seem to be donning the same masks, through which the warriors recognise themselves.
This fight with one’s inner demon necessarily evokes concerns of mortality and death - timeless concerns that acquire an added pungency in the 1960s: would a dangerous, unheeding spell of hedonism finally defy life’s incontrove…