Skip to main content

Margaret


                                               Brother Rabbit, William Morris.


“You live, you flourish, you bloom.” The refrain her mother used to sing when she was still a child. In retrospect those words seemed to belie an admonition of imminent danger- there was no guarantee that everyone could smoothly ascend from “live” to “flourish,” and rarely, she thought, could one’s blooming maturity last well after the tail-end of summer. Musingly she stared out of a dormer window and stretched her tired back. Ladylike elegance made every woman look like a wooden crane. Her listless gaze landed on a tree overladen with burnished leaves; so plastic they seemed that one had the illusion of time finally ticked away to its finality- life only lived on as a pure artificial image. If so, she refused to become anything but a piece of cherished memory.

The scenery from the window remained largely unchanged even years ago. But the difference of her feeling rendered the scenery throbbed and sizzled, constantly very restless. Obsession made one’s life a baffling play. Her theatricality was at that time the most inimitable: hiding behind the façade of complete imperviousness, she harboured secrets, loved a certain one obsessively yet secretly, all various extreme emotions forced her to a point of sporadic bursts of anger and sudden lust for vengeance. But all they could hear was a short, sardonic laugh, escaped itself swiftly out of her throat like black fume out of the furnace. He was lured towards her as if hypnotised by the witch’s incantation. There was no past between them, he knew her not, nor did he recover his mind to think about the future. His life became from then on a protracted Present.

They buried her mother under a tree that they deemed the least noticeable, and he felt liberated. She was liberated, from the parental yoke that was centuries-old and ever-tenacious, from the old provincial world that long ago had already deserted her. Obsession was a mask that was always laughing but never happy. Things were no longer as they were but obsession underscored the normal aspects of a changed life. For instance, bathing her hands in a bucket of ice water, something she would wont to do when her senses appeared inert. How she resented and dreaded the idea of reliving the commonplaces over and over again! Her steely flames in her eyes wavered as she recalled the refrain her mother loved to sing: “You live, you flourish, you bloom.” To live was to break the bondage of everything; to live was to undermine the potency of remembrance, because remembrance only brought remorse and pain, and one did not live to suffer. Yes, life should be a protracted present.

He looked so beautiful in his death as if life had never touched him. She stared up at heaven in mock affliction, addressing her original Father in a tone resounded with histrionic anger: “Why Father? Look what a grand joke you played on him!” Rarely did her express herself with such unbridled vehemence. The flame blossomed from her chest a voluminous rose, folds of petals worming their way towards his body, lavishly licking his wounds with their inflammable tongues. But he budged not nor let out a faintest moan of agony. Impatiently she waved the rose away.


Morality was the universal identity although dredging up unwittingly those yesterdays did make her sigh sometimes. But she would tell herself that the mysteries of those yesterdays always remained unaccounted for. Staring continuously out of the window, beholding a scene that never changed, she was suddenly checked by an onslaught of conflicting emotions but she quickly closed her eyes, trying to get pass the phase. No. No fear before impulsion, and shame always came too late. She volumed aloud her mental voice just to assure herself. Then she spotted something that trembled beneath the heavy leaves: a bird, seeming to bring a belated salve. As usual she tried to ward it off with menace but the bird chirped: “I have nothing to unlearn, I have nothing to fear, because I’m ever-docile.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Honore Daumier

“If you shut up truth and bury it under ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”- Émile Zola
Exited Honoré Victorin Daumier, 10 February 1879, in an impoverishment that many of his contemporaries, especially his foes, would have thought was his long overdue retribution- the painter was blind, heavily in debt, and later relegated to a pauper’s grave. His friends, upon visiting his resting place, would, I imagine, see it a chance to admonish their children: “Now that’s a lesson for you cheeky devils whose tongues rattle off things that should better stay unspoken.” But Daumier devoted his life in revealing those “unspoken things.” His lithography ink proved sharper than most writers’ pens. He vented his rage and stigmatised others’ infamy in his satirical and, oftentimes, side-splitting cartoons. The tone was relentlessly acerbic but only because Daumier was exposing truths that, in the time…

Review: Late Spring (1949)

As a storyteller, Yasujiro Ozu insists on an implausibly objective stance that refrains from direct commentary or criticism; his camera customarily assumes the role of a detached observer, to whom the characters in the film, staring or talking straight to the camera, occasionally address, with an intimacy akin to that between a host and his guest, a closeness that is underpinned by a mutual recognition of the psychological distance that separates the two. The audience, whose perspective, in this case, conflates the camera’s (the director’s), an invisible character’s in the film (to whom the other characters address) and their own, is thus situated amidst this spatial complexity which, as a rule, every work of art necessarily creates.
In Late Spring (1948), the camera serves in part as an underlying comment to the story, which is noted by its economy of details. A prolonged shot of a departing train, on which the father and daughter travel to the city for a one-day excursion, prefigures…

Review: Breathless (1960)

Jean Luc Godard’s first feature feels oddly like a swansong: in many respects the film seems a self-mockery of what it ostensibly celebrates – the new, the bold, the reckless; the 60s zeitgeist that resurrects the anguished ghosts of the 1920s, who, according to F. Scott Fitzgerald, grow up to “find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faith in man shaken.” For the children of the ‘60s, their wars are of a kind in which the opponents constantly change roles: sometimes they are the unmerciful authorities bent on making miserable lives out of their inferiors; in other times they are the society at large, weeding out in its insidious and devious way the errant law-breakers. They all seem to be donning the same masks, through which the warriors recognise themselves.
This fight with one’s inner demon necessarily evokes concerns of mortality and death - timeless concerns that acquire an added pungency in the 1960s: would a dangerous, unheeding spell of hedonism finally defy life’s incontrove…