Written in
the 1920s, when mobsters were a constant scourge to America’s society, “The
Killers,” though containing no more than 3,000 words, reflects palpably the
spine-chilling horror and relentless hostility that accompany such organised
crime. The novella bears testament to Ernest Hemingway’s unparalleled genius,
in that the author’s penchant for laconicness creates the most timeless of
beauty. It is a bracing thriller that comprises barely any descriptions of the
incident but short, impetuous, unnervingly comical conversations between the
characters. Hemingway’s purposely-designed ending- the built-up towards the
final climax is perfectly dismantled by a wanting of dénouement- is the prime
example of a great suspense.
In a 1947
film directed by Robert Siodmak, Hemingway’s story becomes a point of departure
whereon screenwriter Anthony Veiller appropriates the authorial voice and fills
the audience in of the reason an ex-boxer, an outstanding debut from Burt
Lancaster, is targeted by two hit-men, played with due eeriness by Charles
McGraw and William Conrad. Hemingway’s creation is still preserved in its
entirety in the first 20 minutes of the film, with the actors carrying out the
hard-edgedness of the original with much brilliance and adroitness.
The
remainder revolves around the unravelling of the mystery. Edmond O’ Brien is
fitting for the role of a calm and calculated life insurance investigator, who searches
high and low in his dogged pursuit of solving the puzzle. Through flashback the
ex-boxer is revealed as a ruined man doomed the moment he claps eyes on a femme
fatale named Kitty Collins, the first breakout role for Ava Gardner. He takes
to bad courses, joins a mob, confronts the mobsters and flees with the booty
when he realises he is double-crossed; only to be double-crossed again later by,
unsurprisingly, his beloved Kitty. It is slightly disappointing of how Veiller
recklessly bastardised Hemingway’s masterpiece by conceiving the backstory of
the ex-boxer with stock materials that were particularly favoured by 1940s’
film noir.
Hackneyed
though it seems the picture still has its sterling moments, and is effusively praised
by Hemingway. Indebting to Siodmak’s dexterity, the film retains much of the
suspenseful elements that Hemingway would’ve approved of if he were having in
mind a more detailed version of the novella. The mystery is pared down layer by
layer, which increases greatly the entertainment and excitement that are
otherwise worn off if the tempo is unwisely hastened. Exceptional performance
by the leading cast- Lancaster is smouldering, wistful, tragic-heroic; Gardner
never disappoints with her seamless shifting between the sultry and the
duplicitous- also helps exalting the status of the film to that of the classic.
The score is composed by the prolific Miklos Rozsa.
Those who
maintain the conviction of always giving the adaptations a wide berth are still
encouraged to experience the first 20 minutes of the film after they read the
novella. The thrilling sensation of seeing the immortalised words of Hemingway
being so gruffly bandied about is simply ineffable. Avid readers of Hemingway
are bound to be delighted.
Comments
Post a Comment