Frank
Capra’s It Happened One Night (1934)
comes as a perfect antidote to the seemingly endless crises and depression of present
age. It celebrates love and happiness at their incorruptible states; affirms
the existence and possible prevalence of “pure-at-hearts” goodness, and restores
hope to a world that has shown signs of incurable damages. Even when seeing the
film now under a slightly different social context, its counter-Depression
positivism can seem at times too implausible a pipe dream. Ellie’s (Claudette
Colbert) utilitarian kindness towards the hunger-stricken mother and son is
largely induced by and acted on the strength of Peter’s (Clark Gable) disposition
to boastful jests- he flaunts the money and pretends to be a millionaire; she responds
on cue and squeezes that money into the hand of the son. Ironies like this indicate
a discrepancy between the privileged and the destitute that is only going to
widen: charitable instincts come more easily for those who are impervious to
the travails of life, whose narratives follow the immutable line of having
instead of striving. Peter, of the inferior class that also mires in
impoverishment like the mother and son, hesitates before reluctantly giving
away what is perhaps a few months’ rental. Never is a moment of individual
kindness suffused with such pathos.
Great art
entails multiplicity. Just as Capra rhapsodises the fairy-tale-like romance
that transcends the boundary of classes, he makes no bones about the bleak
aspect of reality that lurks around the beautiful picture. The first spark of
affection between the unlikely pair is enkindled when both are compelled to put
on an impromptu show of impersonation, as bickering husband and wife, to put
off scent the detectives hired by Ellie’s father. Playacting soon becomes a
convenient pretext of checking into motels and hitching for ride, a facile
means for indulging in the intimacy that won’t even occur if outside this
particular circumstance. It is only a matter of time that the tenuous line
between reason and illusion is obliterated. This line, in the film, comes in
the form of a “Wall of Jericho,” an old blanket that hangs between their beds, which
cannot be toppled down if without the blast of trumpet (the implication is
quite clear that I suppose no further explanation is needed). On the last leg
of their journey, Ellie, moved by Peter’s ideal of living on a remote island,
takes the initiative of crossing over the “wall” and pledging her love.
There is
something unnerving about the notion of love equaling make-believe. By having
courtship played out in the way of a double act Capra highlights the absurdity
of human relationships. Ellie is plucked back to reality when a series of turn
of events lead her to suppose that Peter’s heart is only on her money and not
herself. The story ends in a wonderful way: Ellie’s hitherto domineering
father, realising that the love between the pair is genuine and mutual, gives
his daughter the invaluable gift of the autonomy, to decide for herself whom
she will spend her life with. Self-determination assumes the ultimate power of
dissolving all demarcations.
Another
film that shares a similar storyline, Wyler’s Roman Holiday, ends with Audrey Hepburn’s Princess Ann chooses her
royal duty over love, and the lovers separate. This coda is comparatively
crueler but it underlines the noble characters of the protagonists, whose
budding romance doesn’t lead them to willful ignorance of their
responsibilities. The short-lived amour seems all but a dream; a very beautiful
dream indeed.
Comments
Post a Comment