Skip to main content

Review: Magnificent Obsession (1954)



Douglas Sirk once considered the essential elements of cinema: “Cinema is blood, is tears, violence, hate, death, and love.” In brief, cinema is everything with life; a life that is, nonetheless, constantly verging on the limits of human life. Such extreme case of existentialism that Sirk posits in his film is rather a point of departure for a more pressing concern: the feverish pursuit for self-autonomy, which is invariably negated by the primacy and the necessity of staying content within one’s own assigned space. A common trait with Sirk’s characters is this seething rebelliousness, either against the societal prejudices or one’s inner demons, that rages beneath an outward show of sense and urbanity; occasionally they are driven to the brink of despair, but always to be saved by their strength and an incurable sanguinity for the future. The state of defeat is rarely the conclusion to which they bow easily, regardless of how inevitable the circumstances have unravelled, and yet, too cautious of the caprice of fate, they also retain an uncomplaining resilience to life’s hardships. 

This is precisely why the word “melodrama” in Sirk’s film entails more than the emphatic display of tears and violence – what underlies is the more important lesson of the futility of man’s eternal fight against fate and destiny, and how a positive outcome might occur the moment the person simply stops fighting. In this regard, however, Sirk seems to favour a miracle that, at times, borders slightly too much on the implausible. 

Implausibility is both the main headache and the recurrent fascination with Magnificent Obsession (1954). The story follows Bob Merrick, a brazen playboy who is saved from a speedboat accident by Dr. Phillips, who dies on the scene whilst trying to resuscitate Merrick. Feeling guilty and responsible for the death of a well-loved doctor known for his munificence, Merrick tries vainly to make peace with Phillips’s widow, Helen, who, as a result of the former’s untimely interference, is left blind after a motorcar accident. From this point on, everything seems to hinge solely on what can only be described as the beauty of providence: love soon blossoms between Merrick and Helen, with the former soberly studying his way to become a doctor. The lovers are temporarily separated when Helen, not wanting to be a nuisance, runs away after Merrick proposes. They are eventually reunited on Helen’s sickbed, after a successful brain operation performed by Merrick, who also miraculously restores Helen’s sight.

Sirk has never been known for his attention on the authenticity of characterisation. He proclaims that one cannot make films about things or people, but “can only make films with things, with people, with light, with flowers, with mirrors, with blood, in fact with all the fantastic things which make life worth living.” In other words, the characters in his films should serve primarily as props; their individual personalities will come to light gradually, but only to the extent of not overriding the story itself and the director’s creative vision. Therefore, it is less with the audience’s identification with the protagonists (neither Rock Hudson nor Jane Wyman was given much to make his and her character distinctive), than with the powerful fusion of sensational storytelling and dazzling visuals (the lurid colour scheme creates an overall effect of unremitting emotional tumult) that Sirk’s melodrama retains its unparalleled brilliance. 

A disadvantage with such emphasis on the dramatic aspect of the film is its inevitable compromise of deeper ideas. The central message of Magnificent Obsession is in its title: that good deeds are returned not to its original benefactor but to others in need. Hampered also by Lloyd C. Douglas’s original story, Sirk did not manage to evoke much from this Christian ideal except, almost imperceptibly, attaching a note of irony to this fantastic drama. It was not until making All that Heaven Allows, arguably Sirk’s best film, that the director would allow the poison of irony to brim over.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Paintings in Proust: Vesuvius Erupting by J.M.W. Turner

In Proust’s Swann’s Way , the narrator’s grandmother is described as one who inculcates in her grandson a reverence for the “elevated ideals.” Infinitely disdainful of the mechanical nature of replica, when shown photograph of the magnificent Mount Vesuvius his grandmother dismisses it with a lofty query as of whether other more acknowledged artists did paintings of the volcano in the first place. She is having in mind the great J.M.W. Turner, whose depiction of Vesuvius in flame displays, in her view, “a stage higher in the scale of art.” The enduring fascination with volcanoes was especially evident in the 19 th century, which saw an irregularly high frequency of Vesuvius eruptions that, at the time, alarmed many of the imminent cataclysm that a thousand of years before destroyed the city of Pompeii. Turner, according to a number of sources, may not be amongst the first-hand witnesses of those eruptions, but badgered his geologist friends, John MacCulloch and Charles Stoke...
2 comments
Read more

Felix Vallotton

"He was there or not there: not there if I didn't see him."- Henry James, The Turn of the Screw One sees immediately from Felix Vallotton’s paintings that he must had been a gifted raconteur. The painter was possessed of the natural aptitude of unfolding and withholding the narrative flow at the most propitious timing. Mysteriousness emerges. The viewers are bound to be tantalised. Whilst most of Vallotton’s paintings are about the quotidian, the domestic, beneath them their pent-up energy seethes and trembles, threatening to explode at any moment. It isn’t just the quotidian that he depicted, but the interior dramas. Any reader of Ibsen’s or Strindberg’s plays will know that interior drama can be the most frenetic. A woman leans towards a man, her hand entwines his body in show of sensuousness. She whispers into his ears something that the viewers are forbidden the right to privy to. But one has the eye to deduce, from the slightly wrinkled of the man’s nose and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Review: La Jetee (1962)

In Matter and Memory , French philosopher Henri Bergson posits an implausible notion – the pure present: “The pure present is an ungraspable advance of the past devouring the future. In truth, all sensation is already memory.” Since time is a movement , an unending progression, there is not a definite point as that of a present moment, Bergson seems to suggest, but an admixture of the past and the future, the has-beens rapidly encroaching on, and eventually subsuming, the what-ifs. In a sense, and as absurd as this may sound, the present is ever elusive to our consciousness: what we perceive of the now , at the very moment in which it is being registered, is already relegated to the realm of the past. The past seems, therefore, the only reality we have really experienced; the reality that we are predestined to never possess. Chris Marker’s La Jetee (1962) envisages a future in which man finally discovers the means of triumphing over time’s irrevocable logic: experiments are ...
Post a Comment
Read more