Skip to main content

Review: Mon Oncle (1958)



Nabokov once said that “satire is a lesson, parody is a game.” With Jacques Tati’s Mon Oncle (1958), the satire and the parody are both a lesson and a game; or, more precisely, a game whose lesson has no other purpose than to highlight the contingency of playing. The oncle is Tati’s alter ego, Monsieur Hulot, who lives in a rundown area of an affluent suburb of Paris, within which his sister’s villa – a Le Corbusier-inspired futuristic monstrosity – ostentatiously stands. A bumbling, taciturn (with only two spoken lines throughout the film) flaneur, Hulot is the odd man out of the more polished and supercilious world of his sister and brother-in-law, but wins companionship and admiration of his nephew, who shows manifest disdain of the sundry technological wonders by which he is surrounded, and prefers the simple pleasures of outdoor activities and mischief-making. 

If the film is intended as a satire of the advent of modernisation, Tati’s invariably equitable, congenial approach to his subject keeps any satirising only on the speculative level. In fact, the clash of the old and the new is presented in a way that is void of visible hostility. As can be seen in a house party that quickly turns into an uproarious fiasco, the consciously superior is just as easily susceptible to human follies as the unconsciously cloddish. And laughter and comedy are, in Tati’s filmic universe, the potent antidotes for every awkward situation, and the ready solution for social divisiveness.

For a major contributor of most of the film’s comic moments, Hulot maintains a rather peripheral and detached post amongst the happenings. In one particular sequence, however, Hulot is seen sneaking back to his sister’s house after the party to fix a vine decoration that he and his nephew unintentionally messed up earlier. This is the only scene in which Hulot is made the focal point: hurrying away the place in the dark, the noise awakens his sister and her husband; their heads are silhouetted from the circular windows on the top of the house, like two giant pupils of an unnamable monster; the lights reach the stealthy figure of Hulot as he suddenly stops short, and the audience is rewarded a suspenseful, stunning image of Hulot dramatically floodlit as though on a theatre stage.

In an allusive way, Tati expresses not so much pessimism for the coming age as a befuddlement for what it entails. This is a feeling that is evidently shared by even the reformists as they blunder along with their adjustment to the new life. Many of the ensuing bizarre situations involve with the introduction of new technologies that prove more of a menace than an improvement to human living: Hulot’s flat, which sits atop an old building enhanced with intricate gadgetry, is only reachable through a series of labyrinthine passageways, landings and elevated terraces. 

Inept at his job at the factory and is too close to his nephew for the liking of his disapproving brother-in-law, Hulot is in the end dispatched from the town. Crumbling buildings are shown finally dismantled, no doubt making way for more gaudy, ultra-functional complexes like Villa Arpel (the house of Hulot's sister's), and Hulot is greeted with a hasty farewell by the concierge's daughter, who trades her normal, home-spun attire with grown-up coquetry. This poignant final look at the soon by-gone chapter is, however, in the very end, superseded by a surprisingly cheerful outlook for the future: Hulot's nephew, now without his beloved uncle by his side, finds an unlikely playmate in his father, much to the latter's joy.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paintings in Proust: Vesuvius Erupting by J.M.W. Turner

In Proust’s Swann’s Way , the narrator’s grandmother is described as one who inculcates in her grandson a reverence for the “elevated ideals.” Infinitely disdainful of the mechanical nature of replica, when shown photograph of the magnificent Mount Vesuvius his grandmother dismisses it with a lofty query as of whether other more acknowledged artists did paintings of the volcano in the first place. She is having in mind the great J.M.W. Turner, whose depiction of Vesuvius in flame displays, in her view, “a stage higher in the scale of art.” The enduring fascination with volcanoes was especially evident in the 19 th century, which saw an irregularly high frequency of Vesuvius eruptions that, at the time, alarmed many of the imminent cataclysm that a thousand of years before destroyed the city of Pompeii. Turner, according to a number of sources, may not be amongst the first-hand witnesses of those eruptions, but badgered his geologist friends, John MacCulloch and Charles Stoke...

Felix Vallotton

"He was there or not there: not there if I didn't see him."- Henry James, The Turn of the Screw One sees immediately from Felix Vallotton’s paintings that he must had been a gifted raconteur. The painter was possessed of the natural aptitude of unfolding and withholding the narrative flow at the most propitious timing. Mysteriousness emerges. The viewers are bound to be tantalised. Whilst most of Vallotton’s paintings are about the quotidian, the domestic, beneath them their pent-up energy seethes and trembles, threatening to explode at any moment. It isn’t just the quotidian that he depicted, but the interior dramas. Any reader of Ibsen’s or Strindberg’s plays will know that interior drama can be the most frenetic. A woman leans towards a man, her hand entwines his body in show of sensuousness. She whispers into his ears something that the viewers are forbidden the right to privy to. But one has the eye to deduce, from the slightly wrinkled of the man’s nose and t...

Review: La Jetee (1962)

In Matter and Memory , French philosopher Henri Bergson posits an implausible notion – the pure present: “The pure present is an ungraspable advance of the past devouring the future. In truth, all sensation is already memory.” Since time is a movement , an unending progression, there is not a definite point as that of a present moment, Bergson seems to suggest, but an admixture of the past and the future, the has-beens rapidly encroaching on, and eventually subsuming, the what-ifs. In a sense, and as absurd as this may sound, the present is ever elusive to our consciousness: what we perceive of the now , at the very moment in which it is being registered, is already relegated to the realm of the past. The past seems, therefore, the only reality we have really experienced; the reality that we are predestined to never possess. Chris Marker’s La Jetee (1962) envisages a future in which man finally discovers the means of triumphing over time’s irrevocable logic: experiments are ...