Skip to main content

Review: The Awful Truth (1937)

 


In general, screwball comedies epitomise Bergson’s definition of the comical: a certain “materiality that succeeds in fixing the movement of the soul”, that is opposed to grace and manifestly out of sync with the prevailing order of society and the normal functioning of human body. A typical example for this is the slipping on a banana peel, which occasions a disturbance of a flexible and continuous body movement and its harmony with the environment. Once repeated, this incidental moment of hilarity persists, but insofar as its oddity comes to be asserted as the new order, the laughter may more or less cease. It is thus an imperative with screwball comedy to negotiate and maintain a balance between surprise and repetition, although, admittedly, in terms of the genre’s distinction from other forms of comedy, what makes its “screwball” is also its capacity for and inclination towards overemphatic effects, which are less calculated to elicit laughter than to censure or survey the absurdity of everyday life.

 

Leo McCarey’s The Awful Truth (1937), widely known as one of the greatest achievements of its kind and in the director’s extensive career, reverses somewhat the time-honoured formula by centring the narrative progression on the returning from a latent and ill-judged assimilation to normality to the natural elements of alterity. Lucy and Jerry, a couple to whom a shared propensity for joke is as much a benefit to their union as it is, indeed, its hidden threat, settle for a spontaneous divorce after apparently catching each other in extramarital relationships. The story hereafter concerns with their attempting to justify and to move past that rash decision, to acclimatise to a new life still periodically haunted by each other’s “untoward” presence, and to repair the damage after realising the “awful truth”. 

 

It was known that both Irene Dunne and Cary Grant were initially unhappy with McCarey’s heavy reliance on improvisation, which gives the finished film a discernibly haphazard look which, on the whole, works surprisingly well. The use of episodic device relieves the burden of systematising the plot line and is as such able to sustain its appeal amongst the audience even when the story itself lacks substance and unity. McCarey was especially adept at crafting the evocative atmosphere for a given situation, whereas character study was evidently not his strongest suit. Thus Lucy and Jerry fail to register as enduring and remarkable an impression as, say, Nick and Nora Charles of The Thin Man (1934), but this is sufficiently recompensed by the magnetic dynamism between the actors. With the casting of Dunne, who until then had not done much comedy - Grant recalls in an interview that Dunne would often whisper to him, “Funny?”, after a take -, McCarey showcased his Bergsonian touch by underscoring the incongruity of a genteel lady like Dunne doing slapsticks and playing a flighty woman. In fact, Dunne’s character appears, of the pair, to be carrying most of the dramatic weight throughout; she is also the one who, in a barefaced honesty that might be considered risqué of her time, declares not long after the couple’s separation, and in anticipation of her new beau’s proposal, that she is still in love “with the crazy lunatic.”

 

The winsome pairing of Dunne and Grant led them to work together on two more films: My Favorite Wife (1940), with Garson Kanin as director and script co-written by McCarey, which contains similar scenarios of the wife posing as the estranged husband’s relative to dupe his fiancée, and a final reconciliation preceded by delightfully suspenseful moment with the couple, in separate bedrooms, waiting for the other to, in reference to a motif in It Happened One Night (1934), tear down the “wall of Jericho”; and George Stevens’s three-hankie weepy, Penny Serenade (1941). McCarey’s entrenched Catholicism, which rendered many of his films rather facile testaments to the virtue of marriage, was resolutely kept at bay in his passion project, also featuring Dunne and Grant but in separate films: the former with the enigmatic and suave Charles Boyer in Love Affair (1939), the latter paired with a slightly theatrical Deborah Kerr in the remake, An Affair to Remember (1957).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paintings in Proust: Vesuvius Erupting by J.M.W. Turner

In Proust’s Swann’s Way , the narrator’s grandmother is described as one who inculcates in her grandson a reverence for the “elevated ideals.” Infinitely disdainful of the mechanical nature of replica, when shown photograph of the magnificent Mount Vesuvius his grandmother dismisses it with a lofty query as of whether other more acknowledged artists did paintings of the volcano in the first place. She is having in mind the great J.M.W. Turner, whose depiction of Vesuvius in flame displays, in her view, “a stage higher in the scale of art.” The enduring fascination with volcanoes was especially evident in the 19 th century, which saw an irregularly high frequency of Vesuvius eruptions that, at the time, alarmed many of the imminent cataclysm that a thousand of years before destroyed the city of Pompeii. Turner, according to a number of sources, may not be amongst the first-hand witnesses of those eruptions, but badgered his geologist friends, John MacCulloch and Charles Stoke...

Felix Vallotton

"He was there or not there: not there if I didn't see him."- Henry James, The Turn of the Screw One sees immediately from Felix Vallotton’s paintings that he must had been a gifted raconteur. The painter was possessed of the natural aptitude of unfolding and withholding the narrative flow at the most propitious timing. Mysteriousness emerges. The viewers are bound to be tantalised. Whilst most of Vallotton’s paintings are about the quotidian, the domestic, beneath them their pent-up energy seethes and trembles, threatening to explode at any moment. It isn’t just the quotidian that he depicted, but the interior dramas. Any reader of Ibsen’s or Strindberg’s plays will know that interior drama can be the most frenetic. A woman leans towards a man, her hand entwines his body in show of sensuousness. She whispers into his ears something that the viewers are forbidden the right to privy to. But one has the eye to deduce, from the slightly wrinkled of the man’s nose and t...

Review: La Jetee (1962)

In Matter and Memory , French philosopher Henri Bergson posits an implausible notion – the pure present: “The pure present is an ungraspable advance of the past devouring the future. In truth, all sensation is already memory.” Since time is a movement , an unending progression, there is not a definite point as that of a present moment, Bergson seems to suggest, but an admixture of the past and the future, the has-beens rapidly encroaching on, and eventually subsuming, the what-ifs. In a sense, and as absurd as this may sound, the present is ever elusive to our consciousness: what we perceive of the now , at the very moment in which it is being registered, is already relegated to the realm of the past. The past seems, therefore, the only reality we have really experienced; the reality that we are predestined to never possess. Chris Marker’s La Jetee (1962) envisages a future in which man finally discovers the means of triumphing over time’s irrevocable logic: experiments are ...