Skip to main content

Review: The Awful Truth (1937)

 


In general, screwball comedies epitomise Bergson’s definition of the comical: a certain “materiality that succeeds in fixing the movement of the soul”, that is opposed to grace and manifestly out of sync with the prevailing order of society and the normal functioning of human body. A typical example for this is the slipping on a banana peel, which occasions a disturbance of a flexible and continuous body movement and its harmony with the environment. Once repeated, this incidental moment of hilarity persists, but insofar as its oddity comes to be asserted as the new order, the laughter may more or less cease. It is thus an imperative with screwball comedy to negotiate and maintain a balance between surprise and repetition, although, admittedly, in terms of the genre’s distinction from other forms of comedy, what makes its “screwball” is also its capacity for and inclination towards overemphatic effects, which are less calculated to elicit laughter than to censure or survey the absurdity of everyday life.

 

Leo McCarey’s The Awful Truth (1937), widely known as one of the greatest achievements of its kind and in the director’s extensive career, reverses somewhat the time-honoured formula by centring the narrative progression on the returning from a latent and ill-judged assimilation to normality to the natural elements of alterity. Lucy and Jerry, a couple to whom a shared propensity for joke is as much a benefit to their union as it is, indeed, its hidden threat, settle for a spontaneous divorce after apparently catching each other in extramarital relationships. The story hereafter concerns with their attempting to justify and to move past that rash decision, to acclimatise to a new life still periodically haunted by each other’s “untoward” presence, and to repair the damage after realising the “awful truth”. 

 

It was known that both Irene Dunne and Cary Grant were initially unhappy with McCarey’s heavy reliance on improvisation, which gives the finished film a discernibly haphazard look which, on the whole, works surprisingly well. The use of episodic device relieves the burden of systematising the plot line and is as such able to sustain its appeal amongst the audience even when the story itself lacks substance and unity. McCarey was especially adept at crafting the evocative atmosphere for a given situation, whereas character study was evidently not his strongest suit. Thus Lucy and Jerry fail to register as enduring and remarkable an impression as, say, Nick and Nora Charles of The Thin Man (1934), but this is sufficiently recompensed by the magnetic dynamism between the actors. With the casting of Dunne, who until then had not done much comedy - Grant recalls in an interview that Dunne would often whisper to him, “Funny?”, after a take -, McCarey showcased his Bergsonian touch by underscoring the incongruity of a genteel lady like Dunne doing slapsticks and playing a flighty woman. In fact, Dunne’s character appears, of the pair, to be carrying most of the dramatic weight throughout; she is also the one who, in a barefaced honesty that might be considered risqué of her time, declares not long after the couple’s separation, and in anticipation of her new beau’s proposal, that she is still in love “with the crazy lunatic.”

 

The winsome pairing of Dunne and Grant led them to work together on two more films: My Favorite Wife (1940), with Garson Kanin as director and script co-written by McCarey, which contains similar scenarios of the wife posing as the estranged husband’s relative to dupe his fiancée, and a final reconciliation preceded by delightfully suspenseful moment with the couple, in separate bedrooms, waiting for the other to, in reference to a motif in It Happened One Night (1934), tear down the “wall of Jericho”; and George Stevens’s three-hankie weepy, Penny Serenade (1941). McCarey’s entrenched Catholicism, which rendered many of his films rather facile testaments to the virtue of marriage, was resolutely kept at bay in his passion project, also featuring Dunne and Grant but in separate films: the former with the enigmatic and suave Charles Boyer in Love Affair (1939), the latter paired with a slightly theatrical Deborah Kerr in the remake, An Affair to Remember (1957).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paintings in Proust: Vesuvius Erupting by J.M.W. Turner

In Proust’s Swann’s Way , the narrator’s grandmother is described as one who inculcates in her grandson a reverence for the “elevated ideals.” Infinitely disdainful of the mechanical nature of replica, when shown photograph of the magnificent Mount Vesuvius his grandmother dismisses it with a lofty query as of whether other more acknowledged artists did paintings of the volcano in the first place. She is having in mind the great J.M.W. Turner, whose depiction of Vesuvius in flame displays, in her view, “a stage higher in the scale of art.” The enduring fascination with volcanoes was especially evident in the 19 th century, which saw an irregularly high frequency of Vesuvius eruptions that, at the time, alarmed many of the imminent cataclysm that a thousand of years before destroyed the city of Pompeii. Turner, according to a number of sources, may not be amongst the first-hand witnesses of those eruptions, but badgered his geologist friends, John MacCulloch and Charles Stoke

Franz von Stuck, Two Dancers

Dancers can be like jousters. Fear and excitement wring their hearts so into tangled skein. Fluttered air brushes against their skins like chill. In anticipation of a good, likely interminable, fight both cannot be more well-prepared, grimacing to each other some distances afar as menacing demonstration of their unconquerable audacities. Everything is all so punctiliously rehearsed and choreographed. Even when darkness descends and everything is shrouded in utter invisibility, each dancer will know by heart when to put which foot forward, to which direction she will sway elegantly her supple bodice to duck narrowly from her opponent, and when the time is ripe, she will let her skirt billow like an arch of rainbow, the more fiery and colourful the rainbow the likelier the chance the dancer is going to claim the final victory. It is always something with Art Nouveau that, when beholding a piece that epitomises most substantially the essence of the said art mov

John Martin, the Great Day of His Wrath (1853)

The sky is ablaze with burning flames and the earth splits asunder- the image of an impending apocalypse looms. Those paintings are impregnated with forebodings of the demise of all living things, and can be served as memento mori- mostly cautionary tales that remind people of their mortality. Landscape paintings that depict the biblical scenes of eternal damnation (most often the Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah) are sometimes reinterpreted as prophetic visions of the end of the world. Painters as early as one in the Romantic period, John Martin, conjured up images that continued to awe and frighten the viewers of today. In John Martin’s The Great Day of His Wrath (1853) a volcano erupts and its ashes and fire surge towards the air, rendering the sky an infernal red. One can easily establish himself into the painting and feel the quake rumble under his feet. The earth takes a topsy-turvydom, where the ground and sky suddenly become one. There are people in the paintin