Skip to main content

James McNeill Whistler

“Death must be so beautiful. To lie in the soft brown earth, with the grasses waving above one’s head, and listen to silence. To have no yesterday, and no tomorrow. To forget time, to forgive life, to be at peace.”- Oscar Wilde, The Canterville Ghost

An unimpressed Ruskin, after viewing Whistler’s Nocturne in Black and Gold- The Falling Rocket (c. 1875), accused the painter of merely “flinging a pot of paint in the public’s face” with this unconvincing depiction of firework display amidst a foggy night sky. Whistler, duly exasperated, quickly sued the art critic for libel. In what followed as probably one of the most famous trials in the history of art- I doubt there were many - the defamed artist won the lawsuit, but it was only a pyrrhic victory. The artist was awarded a mere farthing in nominal damages- an even greater ignominy for one who squandered half of his fortune to reclaim his dignity and reputation. Whistler soon thereafter faced long years of bankruptcy.

Despite Ruskin’s overt incredulity of Whistler’s capacity as an artist, to any indiscriminate eye the artist’s singular talent is of little doubt. Throughout his career Whistler had been aiming for a perfect parallel and consonance between music and art, the two that seemingly so compatible with each other, but are in fact difficult to be coaxed into unequivocal affinity. Not many of us are capable of conceiving music with paintings, or vice versa. Our minds are usually so dull and unimaginative that we need everything to be transparently articulated so we can fully comprehend the meanings. How often are our interpretations informed by the title of the painting? Therefore I think Whistler’s entitling of his work was deliberate. Without indicating that such and such are “symphonies” or “arrangements,” it is very likely that the paintings are to be regarded as yet another depictions of ordinary lives and normal people.

The music in Whistler’s paintings are usually in mild tempo, gentle flow, very rarely is there any ripples; even in their most violent we feel that the volume is loud and strong but not overbearing. Occasionally, we hear silence. The water can be so still and unperturbed; the ruffles of a lady’s skirt so resistant to the sway of the power of winds. There underlies every piece of Whistler’s oeuvre a serene, elegant beauty.

In Symphony in Flesh Colour and Pink: Portrait of Mrs. Frances Leyland (1872-3), the colours of the lady’s dress and that of the background are almost identical. What one sees, at one moment, as a pleasing effect of tonal harmony, turns into an impression of dreary and unnerving the next. We sense a gradual and peculiar blending-in of the figure with its background. With her head slightly turns towards the viewers we see, written vividly on her face, that of unaccountable sadness and weariness. Elegance proves to be merely a semblance of life, beneath which banality locks up the lady’s soul to frost. She appears to be even more lifeless than the white blossoms, the presence of which she listlessly acknowledges. We are not looking at a portrait of Mrs. Leyland. We are looking at a still-life.

Whistler’s people are rarely in a good mood. In any frozen moment they often appear pensive and troubled. In Wapping (1861), we seem to see a precedent of Degas’s L’ Absinthe (1876). The men chat away, the woman looks on, unamused and detached. In the woman’s furrowed brows we read self-alienation, we discern her disenchantment with life frittering away in meaningless leisure. She suffers within herself a slow death, a barely perceptible process of decaying. Following her hand that tightens around the rail- some might want to interpret it as a silent call for help- there reveals a splendid view of harbor. The ships and water are bathed in yellow sunlight. All are a-flutter in preparation for a glorious day of sail. Again, there is a marked contrast between the liveliness of the background and the inanimation of the figures.

We cannot resist asking: what are plaguing those people? What is the cause of the nameless malaise? The tranquil beauty of Whistler’s paintings, engendering mostly from the prevailing use of pearl-like colours and elegant contours, is nonetheless undercut by a mounting feeling of gloominess. Time dutifully ticks by just as any other day. The lives of the people trudge on in the wake, only reluctantly. At any given moment how they wish the day could halt to a frozen point. Ruddiness would bleed out of the cheeks of those beautiful people. They are the phantoms, who roam the world like mists upon a lake.

In Nocturne: Blue and Gold- Old Battersea Bridge (1872-5), time is now the forbidding bridge that watches on whilst a lone figure, writ small, traverses through the water. Life is now weighing heavily upon the back of the person, but, unlike most of Whistler’s characters, he does not cravenly flee from responsibility by transforming into a frozen phantom. Death is beautiful but life is reality. To be alive is to hear that subtle palpitation of heart, however small the sound as comparing to the deafening howls of the river, the thunder, nature, and to know one’s significance to the world. The lone figure, hastening on to his destination, hears it all.


Popular posts from this blog

Honore Daumier

“If you shut up truth and bury it under ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way.”- Émile Zola
Exited Honoré Victorin Daumier, 10 February 1879, in an impoverishment that many of his contemporaries, especially his foes, would have thought was his long overdue retribution- the painter was blind, heavily in debt, and later relegated to a pauper’s grave. His friends, upon visiting his resting place, would, I imagine, see it a chance to admonish their children: “Now that’s a lesson for you cheeky devils whose tongues rattle off things that should better stay unspoken.” But Daumier devoted his life in revealing those “unspoken things.” His lithography ink proved sharper than most writers’ pens. He vented his rage and stigmatised others’ infamy in his satirical and, oftentimes, side-splitting cartoons. The tone was relentlessly acerbic but only because Daumier was exposing truths that, in the time…

Review: Late Spring (1949)

As a storyteller, Yasujiro Ozu insists on an implausibly objective stance that refrains from direct commentary or criticism; his camera customarily assumes the role of a detached observer, to whom the characters in the film, staring or talking straight to the camera, occasionally address, with an intimacy akin to that between a host and his guest, a closeness that is underpinned by a mutual recognition of the psychological distance that separates the two. The audience, whose perspective, in this case, conflates the camera’s (the director’s), an invisible character’s in the film (to whom the other characters address) and their own, is thus situated amidst this spatial complexity which, as a rule, every work of art necessarily creates.
In Late Spring (1948), the camera serves in part as an underlying comment to the story, which is noted by its economy of details. A prolonged shot of a departing train, on which the father and daughter travel to the city for a one-day excursion, prefigures…

Review: Breathless (1960)

Jean Luc Godard’s first feature feels oddly like a swansong: in many respects the film seems a self-mockery of what it ostensibly celebrates – the new, the bold, the reckless; the 60s zeitgeist that resurrects the anguished ghosts of the 1920s, who, according to F. Scott Fitzgerald, grow up to “find all Gods dead, all wars fought, all faith in man shaken.” For the children of the ‘60s, their wars are of a kind in which the opponents constantly change roles: sometimes they are the unmerciful authorities bent on making miserable lives out of their inferiors; in other times they are the society at large, weeding out in its insidious and devious way the errant law-breakers. They all seem to be donning the same masks, through which the warriors recognise themselves.
This fight with one’s inner demon necessarily evokes concerns of mortality and death - timeless concerns that acquire an added pungency in the 1960s: would a dangerous, unheeding spell of hedonism finally defy life’s incontrove…